군론

p-subgroups of finite groups and the three Sylow theorems

This post was machine-translated from the Korean original by Marvin (via Kimi). It may contain errors or awkward phrasing — the Korean original is the source of truth.

\(p\)-Groups

In this post, \(p\) always denotes a prime number.

Definition 1 A finite group \(G\) is called a \(p\)-group if the order of \(G\) is a power of \(p\).

Then it is obvious that every subgroup and quotient group of a \(p\)-group is again a \(p\)-group. Moreover, the following holds.

Lemma 2 Let a \(p\)-group \(G\) act on a finite set \(E\), and consider the set of fixed points of this action

\[E^G=\{x\in E\mid g\cdot x=x\text{ for all $g\in G$}\}.\]

Then

\[\lvert E^G\rvert\equiv\lvert E\rvert\pmod{p}\]

holds.

Proof

That is, we must show that the size of \(E\setminus E^G\) is a multiple of \(p\). Now \(E\setminus E^G\) is a union of (disjoint) \(G\)-orbits each of size greater than \(1\), and by §Group Actions, ⁋Theorem 14 (Orbit-stabilizer theorem) each such orbit has size a power of \(p\), whence the claim.

In particular, if we consider the case \(E=G\) with \(G\) acting by inner automorphisms, then \(E^G\) is precisely the center of \(G\); thus by Lemma 2 the center \(C(G)\) of a \(p\)-group \(G\) is nontrivial.

Theorem 3 For a \(p\)-group \(G\) of order \(p^r\), there exists a series of subgroups

\[G=G_1\supset G_2\supset\cdots G_{n+1}=\{e\}\]

such that \([G, G_k]\subseteq G_{k+1}\) holds for every \(k\), and each \(G_k/G_{k+1}\) is a cyclic group of order \(p\).

Proof

We prove this by induction on the order of \(G\). If \(G=\{e\}\) there is nothing to prove. Assume the statement holds for all \(p\)-groups of order less than \(\lvert G\rvert=p^r\), and let us prove it for \(\lvert G\rvert=p^r\). From the previous argument we have \(C(G)\neq\{e\}\), so we can choose an element \(x\in C(G)\) of order \(p^s\) (\(1\leq s\leq r\)).

Now let \(H\) be the subgroup of \(C(G)\) generated by the element \(x^{p^{s-1}}\). Then \(G'=G/H\) is a \(p\)-group of order \(p^{r-1}\), so by the inductive hypothesis there exists a series of subgroups satisfying the given condition, and taking the inverse image under the canonical projection \(p: G \rightarrow G'\) yields the desired series.

Therefore, by the equivalence of the first and second conditions in §Series of a Group, ⁋Proposition 7, every \(p\)-group is nilpotent.

On the other hand, from §Series of a Group, ⁋Proposition 8 we obtain the following.

Proposition 4 Let \(G\) be a \(p\)-group and let \(H\subsetneq G\) be a subgroup.

  1. The normalizer \(N_G(H)\) of \(H\) in \(G\) satisfies \(N_G(H)\subsetneq G\).
  2. There exists a normal subgroup \(N\) of \(G\) of index \(p\) containing \(H\).

Hence every subgroup of index \(p\) in a \(p\)-group \(G\) is normal.

Sylow Theorems

We now examine \(p\)-subgroups of a general group. Among them, the following are of particular interest.

Definition 5 A Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of a finite group \(G\) is a subgroup \(P\) of \(G\) satisfying the following two conditions:

  1. \(P\) is a \(p\)-group.
  2. \([G:P]\) is not divisible by \(p\).

We write \(\Syl_p(G)\) for the set of Sylow \(p\)-subgroups of \(G\).

Thus, when the order of \(G\) is given as \(p^r m\) with \(p\nmid m\), a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup \(P\) is precisely a subgroup of \(G\) of order \(p^r\). For the remainder of this post we always assume that the order \(n=p^rm\) of \(G\) satisfies \(p\nmid m\).

The Sylow theorems are theorems about Sylow \(p\)-subgroups of an arbitrary finite group, and they are useful in classifying finite groups. The first result concerns the existence of a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup; for this we need the following lemma.

Lemma 6 Let \(n=p^rm\) with \(p\nmid m\). Then

\[\binom{n}{p^r}\not\equiv 0\pmod{p}\]

holds.

Proof

Consider a group \(G\) of order \(p^r\) and a set \(S\) of size \(m\). Then the set \(G\times S\) has size \(n\); let \(E\) be the set of subsets of \(G\times S\) of size \(p^r\), so that

\[\lvert E\rvert=\binom{n}{p^r}.\]

If \(G\) acts on \(G\times S\) by

\[g \cdot (x, s) = (g x, s) \quad (g, x \in G,\; s \in S),\]

then by applying this action to each element of every element of \(E\) (that is, to each element of each subset of \(G\times S\) of size \(p^r\)) we obtain an action of \(G\) on \(E\). The set of fixed points \(E^G\) of this action consists exactly of subsets of the form

\[G \times \{s\},\qquad s\in S,\]

so \(\lvert E^G\rvert=m\), and now by Lemma 2

\[\binom{n}{p^r} = \text{Card}(E) \equiv \text{Card}(E^G) = m \not\equiv 0 \pmod{p}\]

holds.

The first Sylow theorem is then the existence of a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup.

Theorem 7 \(G\) has a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup.

Proof

Let \(E\) be the set of subsets of \(G\) having exactly \(p^r\) elements. Then by Lemma 6

\[\lvert E\rvert = \binom{n}{p^r}\not\equiv 0\pmod{p}.\]

Now consider the left translation action of \(G\) on itself

\[L_g:G \rightarrow G;\qquad x\mapsto gx\]

and view this as an action on \(E\) in the same way as in the proof of Lemma 6. From the assumption that \(\lvert E\rvert\not\equiv 0\pmod{p}\), there exists an orbit \(O\) whose size is not a multiple of \(p\). Let \(X\) be an element of \(O\), and let the stabilizer of \(X\) be \(\Stab(\{X\})=\Stab(X)\). Then \(\Stab(X)\) is a subgroup of \(G\), and (§Group Actions, ⁋Corollary 8) this is the subgroup we want.

To see this, we first use §Group Actions, ⁋Theorem 14 (Orbit-stabilizer theorem) to obtain

\[\lvert O\rvert=\lvert G\cdot X\rvert=[G:\Stab(X)]=\frac{\lvert G\rvert}{\lvert\Stab(X)\rvert}\not\equiv 0\pmod{p},\]

so \(p^r\) divides \(\lvert \Stab(X)\rvert\).

On the other hand, \(\Stab(X)\) is the set of elements \(g\in G\) satisfying \(gX = X\), and therefore for any element \(x \in X\) we have

\[\Stab(X) \subseteq X x^{-1},\]

so

\[\lvert \Stab(X)\rvert\leq\lvert Xx^{-1}\rvert=\lvert X\rvert=p^r\]

must hold. From this we conclude that \(\lvert\Stab(X)\rvert=p^r\).

From this we know that if the order of an arbitrary finite group \(G\) is divisible by \(p\), then \(G\) has an element of order \(p\).

For two subgroups \(H_1, H_2\) of \(G\), we say that \(H_1\) and \(H_2\) are conjugate if there exists \(\rho\in\Inn(G)\) such that \(\rho(H_1)=H_2\).

Theorem 8 The following hold.

  1. The Sylow \(p\)-subgroups of \(G\) are conjugate to each other, and their number is \(1\) mod \(p\).
  2. Every \(p\)-subgroup of \(G\) is contained in some Sylow \(p\)-subgroup.
Proof

Let \(P\) be a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G\), and let \(H\) be a \(p\)-subgroup of \(G\). Considering the left translation action of \(H\) on the set \(E = G/P\), we have \(\lvert E^H\rvert\neq 0\) by Lemma 6, so there exists \(x\in G/P\) with \(Hx=x\). Choose a representative \(g\in G\) of the element \(x\) of \(G/P\). Then for any \(h \in H\) we have \(h(gP) = gP\), so \(g^{-1} h g \in P\). Hence \(H \subseteq gPg^{-1}\), which proves the second claim.

Now suppose \(H\) is a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup. Then

\[\lvert H \rvert = \lvert P \rvert = \lvert gPg^{-1} \rvert,\]

so the above inclusion becomes \(H = gPg^{-1}\), proving the first part of the first claim.

To prove the second part of the first claim, let \(G\) act on \(\Syl_p(G)\) by inner automorphisms. Then from the previous argument any \(P \in \Syl_p(G)\) is a fixed point of this action, and we show that it is the unique fixed point.

Suppose for contradiction that there is another fixed point \(Q \in \Syl_p(G)\). Then \(Q\) is a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G\) normalized by \(P\); that is, \(P\subseteq N_G(Q)\). Now \(P\) and \(Q\) are both Sylow \(p\)-subgroups of \(N_G(Q)\), so by the previous argument there exists \(n \in N_G(Q)\) such that

\[P = nQn^{-1} = Q\]

holds. Therefore by Lemma 6 we have \(\lvert \Syl_p(G) \rvert = \lvert \Syl_p(G)^P \rvert \equiv 1 \pmod{p}\).

Corollary 9 Let \(P\in\Syl_p(G)\) and consider its normalizer \(N_G(P)\). For any subgroup \(M\) of \(G\) containing \(N_G(P)\), the normalizer \(N_G(M)\) of \(M\) in \(G\) equals \(M\).

Proof

Choose \(g\in G\) satisfying \(M=gMg^{-1}\). Then \(gPg^{-1}\) is a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(M\). Hence there exists \(h \in M\) such that \(gPg^{-1} = hPh^{-1}\). Now \(h^{-1}g \in N\), and therefore \(g \in hN \subset M\).

Corollary 10 Let \(f: G_1 \to G_2\) be a group homomorphism between finite groups. For any Sylow \(p\)-subgroup \(P_1\) of \(G_1\), there exists a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup \(P_2\) of \(G_2\) containing \(f(P_1)\).

Proof

Apply the second result of Theorem 8 to the subgroup \(f(P_1)\) of \(G_2\).

Corollary 11 1. Let \(H\) be a subgroup of \(G\). For any Sylow \(p\)-subgroup \(P\) of \(H\), there exists a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup \(Q\) of \(G\) such that \(P = Q \cap H\).

  1. Conversely, let \(Q\) be a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G\) and let \(H\) be a normal subgroup of \(G\). Then \(Q \cap H\) is a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(H\).
Proof
  1. The \(p\)-group \(P\) is contained in a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup \(Q\) of \(G\). On the other hand \(Q \cap H\) is a \(p\)-subgroup of \(H\) containing \(P\), so eventually \(P = Q \cap H\).
  2. Let \(P'\) be a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(H\). Then there exists \(g \in G\) such that \(gP'g^{-1} \subset Q\). Since \(H\) is normal, \(P = gP'g^{-1}\) is again contained in \(H\), and therefore \(P\) is contained in \(Q\cap H\). Now \(Q \cap H\) is a \(p\)-subgroup of \(H\), and \(P\) is a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup, so \(P = Q \cap H\).

Corollary 12 Let \(N\) be a normal subgroup of \(G\). Then the image in \(G/N\) of any Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G\) is a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G/N\), and moreover every Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G/N\) arises in this way.

Proof

Fix \(P\in \Syl_p(G)\), let \(G' = G/N\), and let \(P'\) be the image of \(P\) in \(G'\).

Considering the left translation action of \(G\) on \(G'/P'\), this is a transitive action, so the orbit of \(G\) is \(G'/P'\) itself. Now by §Group Actions, ⁋Theorem 14 (Orbit-stabilizer theorem)

\[\lvert G'/P'\rvert=[G:\Stab(G'/P')]\]

holds. But by definition \(\Stab(G'/P')\) contains \(P\), so \([G:\Stab(G'/P')]\) is not divisible by \(p\), and hence \([G':P']\) is also not divisible by \(p\). On the other hand \(P'\) is a \(p\)-group, so by definition \(P'\) is a Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G'\).

For the converse, let \(Q'\) be another Sylow \(p\)-subgroup of \(G'\). Then \(Q' = g'P'g'^{-1}\) for some \(g' \in G'\), and taking a representative \(g \in G\) of \(g'\), the image of \(gPg^{-1}\) is \(Q'\).

Applications of the Sylow Theorems

As mentioned above, the Sylow theorems are useful in classifying finite groups. For this purpose let us examine Theorem 8 a little more closely. Writing \(n_p\) for the size of \(\Syl_p(G)\), the second part of the first result of Theorem 8 gives \(n_p\equiv 1\pmod{p}\). On the other hand, the first part of the first result shows that \(G\) acts transitively on \(\Syl_p(G)\), so by §Group Actions, ⁋Theorem 14 (Orbit-stabilizer theorem)

\[n_p=\lvert \Syl_p(G)\rvert=[G:\Stab(P)],\qquad P\in\Syl_p(G)\]

holds; in particular \(n_p\) must divide \(\lvert G\rvert\), and as we saw above \(n_p\) does not divide \(p^r\), so \(n_p\) must divide \(m\).

Example 13 Let us classify finite groups \(G\) of order \(15\).

\[\lvert G\rvert = 15 = 3\times 5.\]

First consider the Sylow 3-subgroups. Then by Theorem 8 the number \(n_3\) of Sylow 3-subgroups satisfies the two conditions

  • \(n_3\equiv 1\pmod{3}\),
  • \(n_3\) divides \(5\).

The only \(n_3\) satisfying these two conditions is \(1\), and by Theorem 8 this means that the (unique) Sylow \(3\)-subgroup \(P_3\) of \(G\) is normal.

Similarly consider the Sylow 5-subgroups. By the Sylow theorems, the number \(n_5\) of Sylow 5-subgroups satisfies:

  • \(n_5\equiv 1\pmod{5}\),
  • \(n_5\) divides \(3\).

Likewise the only \(n_5\) satisfying these two conditions is \(1\), so the Sylow 5-subgroup also exists uniquely and is normal. Denote it by \(P_5\).

Now \(P_3\cap P_5\) is a subgroup of both \(P_3\) and \(P_5\), so its order must be \(1\), and hence \(P_3\cap P_5=\{e\}\). Considering the subgroup \(P_3P_5\) of \(G\), from §Isomorphism Theorems, ⁋Theorem 5 (The Second Isomorphism Theorem)

\[\frac{P_3P_5}{P_3}\cong P_5/\{e\}\implies \lvert P_3P_5\rvert=\lvert P_3\rvert\lvert P_5\rvert=15=\lvert G\rvert\]

so eventually \(G\cong \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}\times \mathbb{Z}/5\mathbb{Z}\).

댓글남기기