대수적 구조

Graded Rings

Definition and basic properties of monoid-indexed graded rings

Posted Updated

This post was machine-translated from the Korean original by Marvin (via Kimi). It may contain errors or awkward phrasing — the Korean original is the source of truth.

Graded Rings

If the index set \(I\) is a commutative monoid, we call a family of abelian groups \((A_i)_{i\in I}\) a graded abelian group. (§Abelian Groups, ⁋Definition 16) At the time, there was no additional structure on the \(A_i\), so this was not a particularly interesting definition; but now that a multiplication is imposed on the \(A_i\), this definition becomes more meaningful.

Definition 1 Let a commutative monoid \(I\) and an \(I\)-indexed family of abelian groups \((A_i)_{i\in I}\) be given. If a multiplication defined on \(A=\bigoplus_{i\in I} A_i\) makes it into a ring, and additionally the condition

\[A_i A_j\subseteq A_{i+j}\qquad\text{for all $i,j\in I$}\]

is satisfied, then we call \(A\) an \(I\)-indexed graded ring. Elements belonging to \(A_i\) are called homogeneous elements.

By definition, arbitrary elements of \(A\) can be uniquely expressed as finite sums of homogeneous elements.

Proposition 2 If every element of \(I\) is cancellable and \(A=\bigoplus_{i\in I} A_i\) is a graded ring, then \(A_0\) is a subring of \(A\).

Proof

From \(A_0A_0\subseteq A_0\), the set \(A_0\) is closed under multiplication. Thus it suffices to show that the multiplicative identity \(1\) of \(A=\bigoplus A_i\) belongs to \(A_0\). Write \(1=\sum_{i\in I} \epsilon_i\). Then for arbitrary \(\alpha\in A_j\),

\[\alpha=1\alpha=\sum_{i\in I} \epsilon_i\alpha\in A_j\]

and therefore \(\epsilon_i\alpha=0\) for all \(i\neq 0\), while \(\epsilon_0\alpha=\alpha\) holds only for \(i=0\). Since any element of \(A\) can be written as a sum of homogeneous elements, we have \(\epsilon_0x=x\) for all \(x\in A\), and substituting \(x=1\) yields \(1=\epsilon_0\in A_0\).

In most cases we are interested in \(I=\mathbb{Z}\) or \(I=\mathbb{N}\). Hence the hypothesis of Proposition 2 is satisfied.

Example 3 For any abelian group \(G\), consider the free ring generated by \(G\), namely \(F(G)=\bigoplus_{n\geq 0} G^{\otimes n}\). The product of an element of \(G^{\otimes m}\) and an element of \(G^{\otimes n}\) lies in \(G^{\otimes (m+n)}\), so \(F(G)\) is an \(\mathbb{N}\)-graded ring. (§Definition of a Ring, §§Free Rings over Abelian Groups)

Graded Ring Homomorphisms

Definition 4 For a commutative monoid \(I\) and two \(I\)-graded rings \(A,A'\), a ring homomorphism \(\phi:A \rightarrow A'\) is called a graded homomorphism if \(\phi(A_i)\subseteq A_i'\) holds for every \(i\in I\).

It is not difficult to see that \(I\)-graded rings and \(I\)-graded homomorphisms form a category \(\bgr_I\Ring\).

Homogeneous Ideals and Quotients of Graded Rings

For a graded ring \(A=\bigoplus_{i\in I} A_i\) and a two-sided ideal \(\mathfrak{a}\) of \(A\), the quotient ring \(A/\mathfrak{a}\) may fail to inherit the grading of \(A\). That is, there may not exist a grading on \(A/\mathfrak{a}\) that makes the quotient map a graded homomorphism.

Example 5 Fix a commutative ring \(A\), and consider the polynomial ring whose coefficients are elements of \(A\),

\[A[\x]=\{\alpha_n\x^n+\cdots+\alpha_1\x+\alpha_0\mid n\in\mathbb{N}, \alpha_i\in A\}.\]

Then this carries a graded ring structure via the decomposition

\[A[\x]=\bigoplus_{n\geq 0} A\x^n.\]

On the other hand, consider the ideal \((\x-1)\) generated by \(\x-1\). Then as rings

\[A[\x]/(\x-1)\cong A,\]

and explicitly this isomorphism is obtained by applying the first isomorphism theorem to the evaluation map defined by

\[\alpha_n\x^n +\cdots+\alpha_1\x+\alpha_0\quad \mapsto\quad \alpha_n+\cdots+\alpha_1+\alpha_0.\]

However, in this case the quotient map \(\pi:A[\x]\rightarrow A[\x]/(\x-1)\) sends \(A\x^n\) to all of \(A\) for every \(n\). Hence if \(A\neq 0\), the sum of the \(\pi(A\x^n)\) cannot be a direct sum, and there is no grading on \(A[\x]/(\x-1)\) that makes \(\pi\) a graded homomorphism.

To avoid this, we introduce the notion of a homogeneous ideal.

Proposition 6 For an \(I\)-graded ring \(A=\bigoplus_{i\in I} A_i\) and a two-sided ideal \(\mathfrak{a}\) of \(A\), the following are all equivalent.

  1. \(\mathfrak{a}\) is the sum of the \(\mathfrak{a}\cap A_i\).
  2. Whenever an arbitrary element of \(\mathfrak{a}\) is decomposed into homogeneous elements, each of those homogeneous elements also lies in \(\mathfrak{a}\).
  3. \(\mathfrak{a}\) is generated by homogeneous elements.
Proof

As elements of \(A\), every element of \(\mathfrak{a}\) can be uniquely written as a sum of homogeneous elements. Hence the first two conditions are equivalent to each other, and under condition 1, the ideal \(\mathfrak{a}\) is generated by the elements of \(\mathfrak{a}\cap A_i\), which are homogeneous, so condition 1 implies condition 3. Now assume the third condition and prove the second. Suppose \(\mathfrak{a}\) is generated by homogeneous elements \((x_j)_{j\in J}\). Then an arbitrary \(x\in \mathfrak{a}\) can be written in the form

\[x=\sum_{k\in K} a_k x_{j(k)} b_k,\qquad\text{$K$ finite, $a_k,b_k\in A$}.\]

Now each \(a_k\) and \(b_k\) can in turn be written as a sum of homogeneous elements as elements of \(A\):

\[a_k=\sum_{p} a_{kp},\qquad b_k=\sum_q b_{kq},\]

so we obtain

\[x=\sum_{k\in K}\sum_{p,q}a_{kp}x_{j(k)}b_{kq}.\]

Here each \(a_{kp}x_{j(k)}b_{kq}\) is a homogeneous element and all belong to \(\mathfrak{a}\). Grouping together terms of the same degree gives the homogeneous components of \(x\), and since these all belong to \(\mathfrak{a}\), we obtain condition 2.

A two-sided ideal satisfying the above equivalent conditions is called a homogeneous ideal. Then the following holds.

Proposition 7 For a homogeneous ideal \(\mathfrak{a}\), the quotient \(A/\mathfrak{a}\) is a graded ring, and its decomposition is given by the formula

\[A/\mathfrak{a}=\bigoplus_{i\in I}A_i/(\mathfrak{a}\cap A_i).\]
Proof

Let \(\pi:A\rightarrow A/\mathfrak{a}\) be the quotient map. Since \(A=\bigoplus_i A_i\) and \(\pi\) is surjective, \(A/\mathfrak{a}\) is the sum of the \(\pi(A_i)\), and because the kernel of the restriction of \(\pi\) to \(A_i\) is \(\mathfrak{a}\cap A_i\), we have \(\pi(A_i)\cong A_i/(\mathfrak{a}\cap A_i)\).

To show that this sum is direct, we must show that if a family of finitely supported homogeneous elements \((\alpha_i)\) satisfies \(\sum_i \pi(\alpha_i)=0\), then \(\pi(\alpha_i)=0\) for every \(i\). By assumption \(\sum_i\alpha_i\in\mathfrak{a}\), so by the second condition of Proposition 6 each \(\alpha_i\) must belong to \(\mathfrak{a}\), and hence to \(\mathfrak{a}\cap A_i\). Thus \(\pi(\alpha_i)=0\) for every \(i\).

Finally, from \(A_iA_j\subseteq A_{i+j}\) we obtain \(\pi(A_i)\pi(A_j)\subseteq \pi(A_{i+j})\), so this decomposition gives a graded ring structure on \(A/\mathfrak{a}\).


References

[Bou] Bourbaki, N. Algebra I. Elements of Mathematics. Springer. 1998.

댓글남기기